Skip to main content
AirMilesCalc
Menu
Methodology

Rhumb lines vs great circles

A rhumb line crosses every meridian at the same angle and looks straight on a Mercator map; a great circle is the shortest path on a globe. The two coincide at the equator and diverge dramatically near the poles.

Updated 2026-06-016 min read
Primary sources · 4
  1. [1] Pedro Nunes (1537)First to describe the rhumb line / loxodrome and prove it spirals to the poles rather than ending · Tratado da Sphera · 1537 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_Nunes
  2. [2] Mercator (1569)Original Mercator projection world map, designed to make rhumb-line courses appear straight · Nova et Aucta Orbis Terrae Descriptio ad Usum Navigantium Emendate Accommodata · 1569 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercator_1569_world_map
  3. [3] Bowditch — American Practical NavigatorAuthoritative reference on rhumb-line and great-circle navigation · NGA Pub. 9, current edition · 2019 https://msi.nga.mil/Publications/APN
  4. [4] Veness — Movable Type ScriptsWorking rhumb-line equations and JavaScript implementation · movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html · Continuously maintained https://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html

A rhumb line is the course you would steer if you held one compass bearing for the whole trip. It spirals slowly toward whichever pole the bearing tilts to, and on a Mercator map it looks like a perfectly straight line — which is exactly why Mercator invented his projection.

≤ 30 %
Maximum excess of rhumb over great-circle for high-latitude routes
Bowditch, computed examples
1 bearing
Steerable compass course — that is the entire point
Definition
≈ 0 %
Rhumb-vs-great-circle excess for equatorial pairs
Geometric identity
1569
Year Mercator's projection made the rhumb line straight on paper
Mercator 1569

The two ways to draw a line on Earth

There are two natural lines between two points on a sphere. The great circle is the shortest path — what a geodesic computes. The rhumb line (or loxodrome, from Greek "oblique course") is the path of constant true bearing — what a compass-steered ship draws. On a flat projection these two paths look very different; on a globe both are fully visible curves.

Great-circle (curved on Mercator) vs rhumb line (straight on Mercator) — JFK to Hong Kong
JFKHKGGreat-circle (≈ 12,983 km, what aircraft fly)Rhumb line (≈ 15,200 km, constant compass bearing)
Source: Both paths computed against WGS-84; rhumb via Mercator-inverse integration

Why Mercator made rhumbs straight

Gerardus Mercator's 1569 projection stretches the latitude axis non- linearly so that every angle between any two intersecting curves on Earth's surface is preserved on the map. A constant-bearing course is by definition an angle-preserving curve relative to the meridians, and so shows as a straight line. The price is that area is wildly exaggerated near the poles — Greenland looks larger than Africa, when it is in reality 14 times smaller.

The excess varies with latitude

For two points at the same latitude on the equator, the great circle is the equator itself and the rhumb line is the same path — zero excess. For points at higher latitudes, the great circle bulges poleward while the rhumb line traces a curve closer to the parallel of latitude. The excess grows quickly with latitude and with the longitude span.

Rhumb-line excess on real long-haul pairs
RouteGreat-circleRhumbExcess
Equator: STI (Cape Verde) → JIB (Djibouti)6,760 km6,772 km0.2 %
JFK → LHR5,555 km5,597 km0.8 %
LAX → SYD12,051 km12,238 km1.6 %
JFK → HKG12,983 km15,231 km17.3 %
LHR → AKL18,330 km23,000 km25.5 %
Source: AirMilesCalc, computed against WGS-84

Why ships still use rhumb lines

Modern bulk carriers and most commercial maritime traffic plan rhumb-line courses for legs under about 1,000 nautical miles because steering one bearing is operationally simpler than re-plotting a great-circle multi-segment course every few hours. The extra distance is small on short legs and the navigation simplification is worth it. Beyond 1,000 nm the great-circle saving becomes large enough that ships break the course into shorter rhumb-line segments approximating the great circle.

Frequently asked

If a rhumb line is longer, why is it shown as straight on every world map?
Because the world maps you see most often are Mercator projections, designed in 1569 specifically to make rhumb-line (constant-bearing) courses straight. The price is severe area distortion near the poles. Equal-area projections like Mollweide or Robinson distort shape instead and show great circles as more obviously curved.
Are rhumb lines obsolete?
Not entirely. Short maritime legs are still plotted as rhumb lines for navigation simplicity. Some published instrument flight procedures specify constant-bearing segments. But long-distance navigation is universally great-circle / geodesic today.
What's the formula for rhumb-line distance?
On a sphere, the rhumb-line distance is d = R · √(Δφ² + (Δψ · cos φ_m)²) where Δψ is the Mercator-projected latitude difference and φ_m is the mid-latitude. On an ellipsoid the formula involves an integral that is usually evaluated numerically.
Does AirMilesCalc compute rhumb-line distance?
Not as a primary output — every number on the site is the geodesic distance. The comparison table on this page was computed for illustration. If you need rhumb-line distance for a specific maritime application, an open marine-navigation tool is the right place to look.

Continue reading